Should You Use Your Friend Or Relative As Your Real Estate Agent?

Surely there are some advantages to dealing with a friend. There’s an immediate comfort level and you can contact them at all times which is a privilege not all realtors grant their clients. A true friend will have your best interest in mind and you can be certain they will go the extra mile to do their best for you. You may also be thinking “maybe I’ll get a break in commission too”.

These are presumed advantages as long as they are accompanied by a strong moral fibre and your friend acts accordingly in their professional lives. Remember, even if she’s a lovely person socially, she may be very different in a business context. So it’s critical you entrust this large financial transaction to someone whose business ethics you are sure of.

Now let’s look at the downside of dealing with a friend or relative. The real estate industry is highly litigious because it’s the biggest financial transaction most people make in a lifetime and many things can go wrong. Consumers sue for all kinds of reasons and most lawyers will advise you to include your real estate agent in any lawsuit whether they are a friend or not when something goes wrong.

These lawsuits can arise from allegations of misrepresentation of the condition of the home to incompetence when handling a transaction to breaches of fiduciary duty toward a client. Whether the allegations are true or not, many brokers who run real estate offices spend a great deal of time defending ethics cases or dealing with law suits filed against their agents and brokerages. So don’t think these occurrences are rare because they are not. Ask yourself “can our friendship withstand such an incident and will I have the courage to sue or complain if something goes wrong?”

Soon after, I received a call from an agent who told me she is listing her aunt’s house. She noticed I sell many homes in the area and she was inviting a few agents to view the house to see if anyone had buyers who would buy it before it goes on MLS the following week. At the same time she volunteered that the house was staged, ready to go on the market and the sellers planned a vacation to coincide with the house going on MLS.

I said “why are you soliciting offers now if the house is ready to go on MLS and the sellers made plans to go away anyway?” She responded that the sellers would prefer not to have people trekking through their house. So I asked her what the asking price was and she responded $729,000 but she hoped she could find an agent who has a buyer who would pay $780,000 and then the seller would forego putting the house on MLS. At this point I felt compelled to say “I appraised your aunt’s house three months ago for $849,000 and you will drastically undersell it if you continue with your planned course of action.”

She became defensive and rambled on about all the things wrong with the house and that, to her horror, it even needed to be waterproofed therefore it couldn’t possibly be worth $849,000. I responded “I know all this but this is not Mississauga and many old houses in the city need waterproofing.” I continued, “I reflected this in the suggested list price of $849,000 that I gave your aunt. Why don’t you market all the positives of the house like the desirable lot and room sizes, great street and proximity to all amenities instead?” I told her that if she was going to sell the house before exposing it to the market she was going to under sell it drastically. For the life of me, to this very day, I have no idea why the owner would believe her inexperienced niece who sold houses in Mississauga when I gave her an appraisal of $849,000.

I finally got through to her and she ended up listing the house on MLS and sold it for over $850,000. This is clearly an example of a naive seller who took advice from an agent who is not qualified but she was a relative and she trusted her. The seller, to this very day, is not aware of our conversation and she is lucky her niece contacted me.

Needless to say, I feel very strongly that the consumer should perform thorough due diligence before choosing an agent and that it’s unfair for agents to apply undue pressure on their friends or relatives to use them. I feel people should be allowed to use whomever they want without feeling that their relationship with their realtor friends or relatives will be compromised.

Whether you decide to deal with a friend or not is ultimately up to you. But, in my opinion, based on a quarter century of dealing with all kinds of agents and situations, a few minimum criteria should be in place before you even consider dealing with a friend just to avoid bad feelings.

The agent should have experience with the type of property you are buying or selling; the agent should have experience in, and knowledge of the area and should have a strong and unquestionable moral fibre. If you’re certain about these criteria and your relationship can withstand matters potentially getting complicated, then go ahead and use your friend or relative. If not, it can cost you a friendship, lots of aggravation and possibly a great deal of money.